The Randox Lp(a) assay is calibrated in nmol/L and traceable to the WHO/IFCC reference material (IFCC SRM 2B), providing minimal size related bias. Unlike traditional mass-based methods reporting in nmol/L avoids size-related bias caused by apo(a) isoform variability ensuring a true reflection of cardiovascular risk.
A robust five-point calibrator with accurately assigned nmol/l target values ensures precise alignment across the measuring range. Designed to reflect the heterogeneity of apo(a) isoforms further minimising size related bias and enhancing result reliability. Dedicated Lp(a) control is available offering a complete testing package.*
The Randox Lp(a) assay delivers outstanding analytical performance. Correlation coefficient of r=0.995 when compared with other commercially available methods and a within-run precision of less than 2.54%. This high level of agreement supports confidence in clinical decision making and dependable cardiovascular risk assessment.
Randox's Lp(a) assay has achieved FDA 510(k) clearance, confirming its safety, effectiveness, and robust performance. Healthcare professionals can rely on accurate and reliable Lp(a) measurement to support improved cardiovascular risk assessments.*
Supplied in a convenient liquid ready-to-use format, the Randox Lp(a) assay simplifies workflow, reduces preparation time and minimises potential handling errors – helping to maximise efficiency without compromising on quality.
Instrument-specific applications are available for seamless integration across a wide range of clinical chemistry analysers — enabling easy implementation into existing laboratory workflows.
| Cat No | Size | |
|---|---|---|
| LP2757 | R1 1 x 30ml (L) R2 1 x 15ml | Enquire Kit Inserts RequestsView MSDSBuy Online |
| LP3403 | R1 1 x 10ml (L) R2 1 x 6ml | Enquire Kit Inserts RequestsView MSDSBuy Online |
Instrument Specific Applications (ISA's) are available for a wide range of biochemistry analysers. Contact us to enquire about your specific analyser.
Lp(a) is a highly prevalent and largely genetically determined cardiovascular risk factor, with approximately 1 in 5 individuals worldwide having elevated levels. Unlike many traditional lipid markers, Lp(a) concentrations are minimally influenced by lifestyle or environmental factors.
Despite high prevalence and clear genetic basis, Lp(a) is not routinely included in cardiovascular risk calculators such as QRISK3, meaning inherited risk may go undetected during standard risk assessment. This is clinically significant, as approximately 30% of CVD-related mortality occurs in individuals without elevated conventional risk factors.
A recent Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine paper led by Randox researchers reported that in a large UK clinical cohort, a significant proportion of individuals classified as 'increased cardiovascular risk' on the basis of Lp(a) would not be identified using standard QRISK3 scores alone — underscoring the limitations of current risk models in capturing inherited risk conferred by Lp(a).
A major analytical challenge in measuring lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is the heterogeneity of apo(a) isoforms. This variability arises from differences in the number of kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) repeats, which directly affects immunoassay performance.
In immunoassays, each KIV-2 repeat functions as an epitope. If calibrators do not adequately reflect the full range of apo(a) isoforms present in patient samples, Lp(a) concentrations may be inaccurately reported. Larger isoforms tend to be overestimated, while smaller isoforms — which are more strongly associated with elevated Lp(a) levels and increased cardiovascular risk — may be underestimated. As a result, poor assay standardisation can lead to under-recognition of Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
To minimise isoform-related bias, robust standardisation is essential. Assays calibrated in nmol/L and traceable to the WHO/IFCC reference material (SRM 2B) demonstrate improved comparability and reduced size-related bias.
The European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) recommends reporting Lp(a) in nmol/L rather than mg/dL, as nmol/L more accurately reflects particle concentration and mitigates distortion caused by apo(a) size variability. This approach also supports harmonisation between laboratories and facilitates transition from legacy mass-based reporting systems.
Commercial assays based on the Denka Seiken methodology have demonstrated acceptable bias when compared with the NLMDRL reference method, supported by:
Lp(a) levels are predominantly genetically determined and remain stable throughout life. As a result, a single lifetime measurement is generally sufficient for cardiovascular risk assessment in most individuals.
Repeat testing may be appropriate:
This approach aligns with recent European guidelines, which aim to identify individuals at very high inherited risk (e.g. >430 nmol/L). In contrast, HEART UK recommends targeted testing in higher-risk populations and recognises clinically relevant risk at lower thresholds (e.g. >90 nmol/L).
Given its high prevalence, strong genetic basis, and absence from tools such as QRISK3, Lp(a) represents a substantial and under-recognised contributor to cardiovascular risk.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), through its Working Group on Lp(a) and together with research institutions and several diagnostic companies recommends that laboratories use assays which do not suffer from apo(a) size-related bias. The IFCC SRM 2B was accepted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation as the First WHO/IFCC International Reference Reagent for Lp(a) to ensure conformity by diagnostic companies to the European Union's Directive on In vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices for the metrological traceability of calibrator materials 4.
Download the Health UK Consensus statement on Lipoprotein(a): A call to action Download
To find out more about Lipoprotein(a) Assay and other diagnostic reagents, enquire now.